約 5,315,978 件
https://w.atwiki.jp/rsf-ffxiv/pages/125.html
[]で囲まれた部分は訳者注。 ほぼ直訳、超訳。 難しいとこもよく分からないまま訳してるので意味不明なところアリ。 修正案下さい。 まえがき ダメージ計算式 Auto-Attack Potency 属性防御 Block 命中力/回避力 GCD Damage over Time (DoT) Enmity Mechanics まえがき 最初に先週のポストについて少し訂正をします。 オーバーヒール[HPが満たんの対象にヒールをすること]でもヘイトは上昇する。 先週の検証では別の結果になったが、再検証によって結果を確定させました。 意思力は不思議なステータスだ。 先週はSTRと意思力を大体２：１の割合で振るとダメージ増加にもっとも効率的だと言った。 これはある側面で見ると正しい。 竜騎士/槍術士では、オートアタックで２：１のリターンを得た。 DTRが６４上昇するごとに平均ダメージは７上昇した。 モンク/格闘士で威力１００のWSを使った場合には5.8 1だった。 これは意思力を76上昇させたときにダメージが3上昇する計算だ。 白魔道士/幻術士では、LSメンバーが意思力を25上昇させることでストンラ(威力170)を290-291まで平均ダメージを上昇させた。 ここまでで分かることは意思力は魔法やWSに比べるとオートアタックに強く影響するということだ。 まだまだデータが足りず、結論を出すには至っていない。 ここからが新情報となる。 ダメージ計算式 この週末では命中率の計算式に注目してデータを集めた。 ここでの検証には主に竜騎士を用いている。 DRG DMG = (威力/100) x [(0.0032 x STR + 0.4162) x (武器のダメージ) + (0.1 x STR – 0.3529)] もし、意思力を基本値である202で留めている場合、この計算式ではじき出される威力100のWSの平均ダメージは0.5から1になる。 これは私が取ったデータ全てに当てはまった。試したものは武器ダメージが5，１０，１５，２７，３６，４１のものとなる。 意思力の影響について徹底的に試したわけではないが、現在での意思力を含む計算式は以下のようになる。 DRG WS DMG = 上記数式 + (意思力-202) x (0.035 to 0.05 for Weaponskills) 意思力によるダメージ増加について正確な数値は出なかったが、WSでの数値は0.035から0.05の間になると見ている。 つまり、意思力が100増えたとき、攻撃力の平均値は3.5から5ポイント増加する。 モンクと戦士ではこの数式に少し手を加えなければいけないことも追記しておこう。 ここで述べたいことはジョブ/クラスでどう変化するのかということだ。 竜騎士と戦士を同じSTR･意思力･武器攻撃力で比較したときに、竜騎士/槍術士は平均ダメージが3ポイント高い。 これはダメージに影響することでもっとも確実な事柄だ。 槍術士と竜騎士の間でも2-3ダメージの差が出ることも分かっている。 つまり、単純に竜騎士が全てのダメージに+3のボーナスを得ていると考えるのが良いだろう。 個人的にはありえないことだと思うのだが、データにはそう表れている。 モンクも同じステータスの戦士に比べると大体2.5-3ほどダメージが多くなるようだ。 そこで、モンクと戦士に関する攻撃力の数式は以下のようになる MNK DMG = 上記数式 - 1.5 or 2 (検証の余地有り) WAR DMG = 上記数式 - 3 データ自身の精査を行うことで、1-2ポイント程度は増減することもあるだろう。 ここまでの情報ではまだ100%とは言えない。 WS威力などの差は、乗算された状態で表れる。たとえば威力300のWSでは平均ダメージに3-6ポイントの差が出ることが予測される。 What does this all mean, and what can we take away from this? 最高の武器ダメージを持つ武器が、マテリアでのステータス上昇も含めて最高のSTR修正値を持つことになるだろう。 つまり、事実上は最高の武器ダメージをもつ武器が最高のダメージを出せる武器/防具となる。 この計算式では与ダメージに有効なステータスを見つけることは出来ない。 唯一分かることはWSの与ダメージには 武器ダメージ＞STR＞意思力 の順番で有効だということだけだ。 この数式はLv50より下のジョブ／クラスには当てはまらない。 私の想像ではレベルに応じて数式も変動している。 また、ソーサラークラスについてもこの数式は適用されていないようだ。 Auto-Attack Potency Weapon auto-attack potency is not a set number. If you look at the stats of a Mogfork for example, you will notice 2 values. There is a Physical Damage value of 41. And there is an auto-attack value of 40.45. To calculate the Auto-Attack potency, you must divide the auto-attack value by the Physical Weapon Damage. For example Mogfork AA = (40.45/41) * 100 = 98.66 Gae Bolg AA = (45.76/44) * 100 = 104 This means a Gael Bolg auto-attack will do the same damage as a weaponskill with a potency of 104. If you are wanting to use the damage formula I listed above to predict auto-attack, you need to determine your weapon’s AA potency first. For example, Mogfork AA damage = (98.66/100) * [(0.0032 x STR + 0.4162)*(41) + (0.1 x STR - 0.3529)] Defense and Magic Defense On the opposite side of damage calculation, we are also interested in how to reduce damage output by enemies. First let me assert that VIT does not influence damage reduction for Physical Damage or Magical Damage. With that in mind, there are 3 variables that influence damage taken. We will discuss 2 of them in this section, PDEF and MDEF. To test this, I found the same 5% variation in damage from the midpoint (this time in damage received by enemies). I increased either my PDEF or MDEF depending on whether I was fighting an elemental or an enemy’s physical auto-attack. I then plotted the returns, and I found an interesting and pretty strong indication that PDEF and MDEF give percent damage reduction in a linear fashion. Here are some graphs to help show this Level 40 Basilisk Auto-Attack http //i.imgur.com/8cxbkUC.png Level 45 Ringtail Stone Fling (the graph is for the Ringtail data) http //imgbox.com/abxUVW1b Level 28 and Level 50 Water Sprite Water Attack http //i.imgur.com/b4rhu8v.png Again, appears to strongly suggest that PDEF and MDEF are a direct % cut. This would explain why our attacks all seem to be doing the same damage to all the mobs - they all have 0 DEF, meaning 0% damage cut. My friend, Kaeko, went ahead and took the best fit curve and charted out how much every 50 DEF would give you. He also went ahead and plotted the return of adding every 50 additional defense (increasing return at ridiculously high values). This produced the following http //imgbox.com/acrDTeBJ As you can see, every 1 point of PDEF or MDEF is the equivalent of a 0.0445% damage reduction from baseline. This trend constant regardless of enemy level. The curved image on the right simply illustrates the increased returns at higher PDEF and MDEF levels. In other words, if I take 1000 points of damage naked, then I take 100 points of damage at 90%, if I increase my defense by just another 5% to 95%, I will reduce by total damage taken to 50 point of damage which is 50% of the damage I was taking at 90% defense. However, we will most likely never approach these values, so this is more of an academic exercise than a practical one. 属性防御 試行に必要な装備を装備を見つけることが難しいので、書けることは少ない。 以下に生のデータを置いておく。 http //i.imgur.com/HPO2rKw.png 物理防御と魔法防御を固定し、火属性を変動させながらLv31のファイアスプライトと戦った。 注目すべきデータは最後の2つ。 火レジが+22のときに被ダメージが3.8%減少 火レジが+38のときに被ダメージが6.8%減少 より正確な数値を得ないことには、属性防御の詳細を知ることもできない。 現時点では属性値1ポイントあたり0.14-0.18%の被ダメージ減少を見込めるということがわかっているだけだ。 これは魔法防御1ポイントあたりに比べると3-4倍の効率を持つ。 ______________________________________________________________________________ Block Once again, my blocking data should be taken with a grain of salt. To get accurate numbers, I would have to get 1000s of data points. However, I only counted to 120-170 since I was doing it manually without a parser. Here is what I found (At 222 STR) 10 Block = 5% damage reduction 24 Block = 6% damage reduction 56 Block = 8% damage reduction (At 188 DEX) 48 Block Rate = ~05.5% Block Chance 106 Block Rate = ~08.2% Block Chance 220 Block Rate = ~15.2% Block Chance Increasing my STR by 84 points only increased by block by 1% damage reduction. My LS mate Will noted that damage mitigation is similar regardless of damage done. So if a L50 mob does 1000 or a L1 doess 100 damage, you will mitigate the same %. He also mentioned that at 360 STR, the damage mitigation is 23% with the Relic Shield. As a side-note, parry seemed to be at a base of 10% reduction with the 341 base Parry. Also, you can parry while having a shield equipped. I am not sure if this was possible in 1.0. Edit A player named Khagen Dragnir messaged me his own block testing. Here is his spreadsheet and his data. It is fairly well done, and the data seems to confirm what I saw with the influence of STR on block reduction. https //docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtZhNz9FuU6LdFA1Y0hqeU1oV0JaVnA1NWhjY2tWVlE#gid=0 命中力/回避力 以下に2つのイメージを用意した http //i.imgur.com/tvg2GiDh.jpg http //i.imgur.com/Cusx4skh.jpg これらの画像から分かることは2つある。 一つ目、回避力は敵のレベルに関係なく影響する。 ここでのSSはチャット欄が一番回避ログで埋まったと感じたところで撮ったので、常にこのような回避をするわけではない。 それでも、Lv50のキャラクターでLv31や40の敵と戦ったときに回避率の高さを感じることができる。 おそらく、Lv50の回避力の値が敵の命中力に比べて高いことが予測できる。 二つ目、自分よりレベルの高い敵と戦うときには命中力の値が重要になるということ。 画像の数値が逆になったと考えると･･･ GCD Just a quick note about GCD. User Vierkin from Reddit made a pretty good post determining the influence of Skill Speed on GCD. Here is his/her spreadsheet https //docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArgPfZyoR7oNdFFHSWtNNWo4RTFoS182WWhIQUg0ckE#gid=2 Here is a spreadsheet with the an L30 PGL data included for comparison https //docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjI8PTbz39xPdFRGV0ZzcF9qRnh3UTZyREVDVTg0OEE#gid=0 Note that there is an apparent pattern of 10/11/10/11 for the amount of skill speed needed above 344 to reduce the GCD by 0.01s. This is pretty helpful. If you are just over the threshold for a GCD value, you should not add Skill Speed if you can not add at least 10 or 11 points more. Also note how the GCD reduction with Skill Speed is different for a L30 PGL. This isn’t that important for end-game content. However, it was interesting to note that Skill Speed’s influence seems to scale with level. Damage over Time (DoT) いくつかのTipsに留めておく。 猛者の撃、捨て身、クリティカル関係のBuffはDoT WSに影響しない センチネル、忠義の剣はDoTダメージを軽減しない DoTを受ける前にストンスキンを受けていればDoTダメージを受けない DoTを受けている最中にストンスキンを受けてもDoTダメージは受ける DoTはゲーム内のユニバーサルタイマー（？）に表示される Enmity Mechanics All updates as of 6/30/2013 will be in Purple Buffs Shield Oath is a PLD buff that grants +enmity to all actions. This is preliminary, but it appears that Shield Oath doubles the enmity generated from each action. 2 Flashes (no Shield Oath) = 1 Flash (Shield Oath) Buffs themselves give hate. Buffs give 70 points of damage hate. Buff hate gets divide amongst multiple enemies. This is most likely is a strict divisive fashion. Roughly 5.5 uses of Sword Oath will equal the hate generated from Flash (without Shield Oath) Roughly 11 uses of Sword Oath will equal the hate generated from Flash (with Shield Oath) Weaponskills The +enmity attribute present on weaponskills such as Skull Sunder and Savage Blade appear to be multipliers of hate damage and not just a strict + X amount of hate. Savage Blade = ~2x Riot Blade (no combo, no shield oath) with Weathered GladiusSavage Blade = ~2x Riot Blade (no combo, no shield oath) with Moogle Blade. (note both Savage Blade and Riot Blade are 100 potency weaponskills). Damage over Time (DoT) abilities continue to generate hate with every tick. A 20 potency 30s DoT will generate 200 potency worth of hate over the 30 seconds and not all at once. Abilities Provoke is a GLA ability that instantly ties you with the player who has the highest enmity and places aggro on you. As long as the person you are tied with does no further actions, he will forever remain below you on the enmity list. The skill essentially "catches you up" Example Aki the BLM has 5000000 points of enmity on Ifrit Miko the PLD died and got raised. He currently only has 1000 points of Ifrit. Miko uses Provoke. Miko now has 5000001 points of enmity and is at the top of the hate list. (Note This is permanent hate) Provoke gives you 1 point of initial hate. If I use provoke, then Miko uses provoke, then I have 1 point of hate and Miko has 2 points of hate. Flash is a GLA ability that performs AoE hate without having to target. The enmity value from Flash follows a similar formula to the damage formula. The hate value is dependent on Weapon Damage, Strength, and Determination with their influence in that order. In addition, the Blind debuff produces additional enmity. Cure Hate Overcuring does not appear to generate hate. Also 1 Flash (no Shield Oath) = ~750 Cure (Aque healed on WHM 300/heal, took 3 heals to steal hate) 1 Flash (Sheld Oath) = ~1500 Cure (Aque healed about 1500 on 5 cures) I was wrong about the previous statement that overcuring does not cause hate. Overcuring causes the same amount of hate as normal curing 1 POINT OF CURE HATE = 0.5 POINTS OF DAMAGE HATE Regen s health ticks cause cure hate per tick. edit Hate from cures is most likely distributed amongst multiple enemies. Hate Cap Since computers have number limitations and cant calculate infinity, there has to be a hard cap on the amount of hate a person can have. We wanted to test this for the purpose of future hate manipulation tactics. To do so, we had Will spam Flash with Shield Oath on for about 100-150 Flashes. We then had Miko spam Cure II. At about 30k Cure Hate (15k Damage Hate), Miko s enmity bar was roughly 20% full. This leads us to believe that the enmity cap is at least 75,000 Damage Hate and probably higher. We are most likely never going to reach those numbers in a fight, so the effort towards pinpointing an exact hate value is moot. ______________________________________________________________________________ Thank you everyone for taking the time to read through all of this. Once again I would like to reiterate that this was very “quick” testing. I did not look for 100% accurate values since the Beta playtime is limited. So please take my data/ideas with a grain of salt. Also, I am not sure how much more testing I will be doing until Phase 4. I think I have a pretty solid understanding of the basic mechanics of the game, and after reading my posts I hope you do too. Once again, special thanks to Kaeko Leta Miko Neversleeps Will Brannigan Aki Nai Katsu Kobashi Aque Lia Khagen Dragnir (Ragnarok) And all the members of Dancing Mad LS/FC who provided free gear and bodies to test with~ Seiken Valk Dancing Mad FC (dancing-mad.com) Excalibur
https://w.atwiki.jp/nicocachenlwiki/pages/24.html
1. 依存ライブラリのダウンロード https //www.bouncycastle.org/download/bouncy-castle-java/#latest から bcprov-jdk15on-*.jar と bcpkix-jdk15on-*.jar と bcutil-jdk15on-*.jar をダウンロードして それぞれリネームして bcprov.jar と bcpkix.jar と bcutil.jar とし、libフォルダに配置します。 2. genCerts.batの実行 これによりcertsフォルダ内に鍵と証明書(ca.cer, ca.jks, site.cer, site.jks)が生成されます。 certsフォルダ内のファイルは公開しないように注意してください。 証明書を再生成したときはNicoCache_nlの再起動も必須です。 3. config.properties へ enableMitm=true を設定 4. ブラウザに生成された認証局の証明書をインポート a) Chrome(Windows10)の場合 a-1. Windowsボタン certmgrと入力 ユーザー証明書の管理 a-2. 信頼されたルート証明機関をクリック後、操作 すべてのタスク インポート a-3. certs/ca.cerを選択してインポート a-4. Chromeを再起動 b) Firefoxの場合 b-1. 設定 プライバシーとセキュリティ 証明書 証明書を表示 認証局証明書 インポート b-2. certs/ca.cerを選択 b-3. 「この認証局によるウェブサイトの識別を信頼する」にチェック b-4. Firefoxを再起動します c) Firefoxの場合2 c-1. URLバーにabout configと入力. c-2. security.enterprise_roots.enabledをtrue. c-3. Firefoxを再起動. c-4. これでWindows証明書ストアのルート証明書を認識させることができます d) iPhoneの場合 d-1. ca.cerをメールで添付して送ります (注：ca.jksの方は機密情報が入っているので送らないで下さい) d-2. ca.cerを開いてプロファイルのインストールを行います。 d-3. 設定 一般 情報 証明書信頼設定 から ルート証明書を全面的に信頼します 注： pacファイルを利用している場合はpacファイルが古くないか確認！ - ... // nicovideo,smile,nimg,dmcへのアクセスを全てNicoCache_nl経由にする proxy.pac // https対応 function FindProxyForURL(url, host) { if ((shExpMatch(host, "*.nicovideo.jp") || shExpMatch(host, "*.smilevideo.jp") || shExpMatch(host, "*.nimg.jp") || shExpMatch(host, "*.dmc.nico") ) (url.indexOf("http ") == 0 || url.indexOf("https ") == 0)) { return "PROXY 127.0.0.1 8080"; } return "DIRECT"; } ユーティリティソフト 証明書管理ユーティリティを作成しました NicoCache_nl Easy Batch.7z_2020/08/15版 BouncyCastleでダウンロードしたbcprov-jdk15on-*.jarとbcpkix-jdk15on-*.jarをgenCerts.batで実行してファイルが出ない場合は、高速インストーラのなかにあるbcprov-jdk15on-*.jarとbcpkix-jdk15on-*.jarを使えばおｋ -- 名無しさん (2021-07-22 13 08 38) 名前 コメント
https://w.atwiki.jp/mrfrtech/pages/30.html
Market Analysis The worldwide Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) verification market size is relied upon to enroll a dramatic CAGR 14.9% during the gauge time frame. SAML Authentication market to reach USD 2.8 billion by 2026. The SAML confirmation is a normalized technique for validation to demonstrate one s personality and empower admittance to every one of the outside applications and administrations they want to get to. SAML is a bunch of guidelines that empower all web clients to sign in utilizing a web-based interface and consistently access the data or other internet-based administrations without logging in giving qualifications on various occasions. SAML is an open-source XML convention that empowers the trading of data for validation and approval between a personality supplier and specialist organization (normally a cloud or an electronic application). SAML is also referred to with terms like token-based verification, security token administrations, combined confirmation, and personality alliance. It was first delivered by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) in 2002. The increment drives the security declaration markup language SAML Authentication market in the requirement for viable administration of mass characters and the ascent popular for a predictable and brought together approach to guarantee the security of personalities. Moreover, the expansion in Internet infiltration and fast advancements in the telecom business expand the utilization of the Internet over cell phones in arising economies. For example, India supports the development of the security affirmation markup language (SAML) verification market. The rising pattern for BYOD is setting out open doors for SAML arrangements and is relied upon to take the SAML Authentication market development to a higher level. In any case, this market development is hampered by the restricted mindfulness in regards to the accessibility of recognizable proof and verification conventions to forestall unapproved venture access. Request a Free Sample @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/10472 Market Segmentation By component, the global security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market has been divided into solution and service. By deployment, the global security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market has been divided into cloud-based and on-premises segments. Based on vertical, the global security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market has been divided into BFSI, IT telecom, energy utilities, healthcare, oil gas, manufacturing, retail, and others. The security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market has been analyzed for five regions—North America, South America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East Africa. Regional Analysis The security affirmation markup language (SAML) verification market is assessed to enlist a remarkable CAGR over the gauge time frame. The geographic investigation of the security declaration markup language (SAML) validation market has been directed for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa, and South America. North America is relied upon to enlist the biggest piece of the pie essentially because of the presence of central industry participants. The US is relied upon to lead the market in North America because of the elements, for example, an expansion in the reception of SAML verification arrangements, development in IoT, BYOD pattern in huge and little associations, and an ascent in inner and outer dangers. The European market for security attestation markup language (SAML) confirmation is relied upon to remain at the second situation during the audit time frame chiefly because of the administrative consistence prerequisites and quick monetary development across nations like the UK and Germany. Also, the expanding number of cloud-based administrations are expanding the responsiveness of the data, which, thusly, is helping the market development. Asia-Pacific is relied upon to be the third overwhelming locale as far as taking on security statement markup language (SAML) validation across industry verticals. A few business associations store their delicate data over the cloud, requiring a solid verification framework to deal with character and access the executives. The provincial market has been divided into China, India, Japan, and the remainder of the Asia-Pacific. China is the main nation-level market, while India is projected to be the quickest developing country during the gauge time frame. The Chinese market is relied upon to report the most elevated piece of the pie, attributable to the elements like an enormous number of clients in a venture, making them fundamental for executing SAML validation arrangements and administrations. Moreover, India sees an expansion in its quantity specialist co-ops in the country. Industry News In July 2019, programmers took the individual data of in excess of 106 million individuals from monetary company Capital One - the third-biggest backer of charge cards in the US. Moreover, In August 2018, aggressors took USD 13.5 million from India s Cosmos bank by undermining their monetary frameworks. Key Players The key players in the global security assertion markup language (SAML) authentication market are Thales (France), Ping Identity (US), Amazon Web Services, Inc. (US), Okta (US), Oracle (US), miniOrange Inc. (US), Zoho Corp. (India), OneLogin, Inc. (US), SSO Easy (US), SAASPASS (US), Auth0 Inc. (US), BIO-key International (US), RCDevs (Luxembourg), Ariel Software Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (India), and Microsoft (US). Browse Full Report Details @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/security-assertion-markup-language-authentication-market-10472 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Scope of The Report 2.1 Market Definition 2.2 Scope of The Study 2.2.1 Research Objectives 2.2.2 Assumptions Limitations 2.3 Market Structure Continued… Similar Report** Passport Radar Market https //www.my-diary.org/edit/a/viewentry/546452249 Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Market By Security Type (Human Intelligence, Content Intelligence, Dark Web Analysis, Link/Network Analysis, Data Analytics, Text Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Others), Technology (Bid Data Software, Video Analytics, Text Analytics, Visualization Tool, Cyber Security, Web Analysis, Social Media Analysis, Others), Application (Military Defense, Homeland Security, Private Sector, Public Sector, National Security, Others) About Market Research Future At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research Consulting Services. Contact Market Research Future (Part of Wantstats Research and Media Private Limited) 99 Hudson Street, 5Th Floor New York, NY 10013 United States of America 1 628 258 0071 (US) 44 2035 002 764 (UK) Email sales@marketresearchfuture.com Website https //www.marketresearchfuture.com #market #research #industry #data #growth #trend #report #analyis #share #marketing #forecast #digital #geographic #demographic #gnews Plugin Error キーワードを入力してください。 #tech #researchreport #marketreport #futrue
https://w.atwiki.jp/marketresearch/pages/30.html
CRM Analytics Market Report Overview According to the latest QMI Market research study, the Predicate CRM Analytics Market size proportion in terms of sales become worth USD and CAGR developing at a compound approximately throughout the forecast duration 2023 to 2032. additionally provide their clients functions like document-breaking client care, traceability, real-time records, and on-time shipping statistics way to CRM Analytics Market answers. Furthermore, era allows deliver chain companions to understand the correct location of their merchandise as well as authenticity, product safety, satisfactory, and reliability. It is projected that the growing call for CRM Analytics Market The worldwide representative checking arrangement CRM Analytics market is vigorously divided because of the presence of countless organizations working on the lookout. Moreover, the solid presence of market players with restricted geographic concentration and striking client based inside the nearby market has additionally supported the general seriousness existing on the lookout. By and by, a critical number of CRM Analytics market players working in the worldwide worker observing arrangement various membership based representative checking answers for various industry verticals Click To Access Sample Copy of This Report https //www.quincemarketinsights.com/request-sample-63286?utm_source=offpage/pranali CRM Analytics Market Dynamics The CRM Analytics Marker better exchange straightforwardness presented by is probably going to help the worldwide CRM Analytics market development. Minimal expense, secure, and expedient installment handling administrations are made conceivable by the CRM Analytics Market Size as a result of the utilization of encoded conveyed record innovation. This makes it conceivable to confirm exchanges progressively without utilizing go-betweens like clearinghouses and banks. The huge ascent of computerized installments in the retail business has expanded interest for dispersed record innovation. Straightforwardness, security, detectability, and productivity will all work on because of the store network's use of innovation. The arrangement brings providers' and purchasers' groups together on a similar stage to effectively and safely shares the information. CRM Analytics Market Competitive Landscape The report likewise gives an inside and out investigation of the market's principal rivals, as well as data on their intensity. The examination likewise distinguishes and investigations significant business systems utilized by these fundamental CRM Analytics market players, like A portion of the primary contenders ruling the worldwide CRM Analytics market incorporate Key Players Salesforce Inc., IBM, SAP AG, SAS Institute Inc., Oracle, Teradata, Accenture, Angoss Software, Microsoft. CRM Analytics Market Segmentation Analysis The global CRM Analytics market is segmented based on product By type, application, end-user, and region. The Insight of type, the market has been segmented consortium The developing utilization of innovation that empowers information to be uninhibitedly traded between firms, the production network the executives fragment presently overwhelms the overall CRM Analytics market. This pattern is Segmentation By Type (Sales Analytics, Customer Analytics, Contact Center Analytics, Marketing Analytics, Web Social Media Analytics), By Deployment Model (Cloud, On-Premises), By End-User (Large Enterprises, Small And Medium Businesses), By Vertical (Banking, Financial Services And Insurance (BFSI), Telecommunications And IT, Retail Wholesales, Energy And Utilities, Manufacturing, Healthcare And Life Science, Transportation And Logistics, Media And Entertainment, Hospitality) supposed to fuel classification development. To more readily comprehend end clients, production network the board frameworks CRM Analytics Market Regional Analysis The Geographical Analysis 2021 largest global CRM Analytics market share. To keep its place in the global market, the region has made a large investment in CRM Analytics Market. Trending Innovation technologies like brilliant installments, agreements, and others are currently generally utilized because of innovation arrangement. Tech goliaths Europe, Asia Pacific, North America, Africa, South America, and Middle East, and it is expected to register strong growth during the forecast period. The market in Asia-Pacific is expected to register the highest CAGR during the forecast period. North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Southeast Asia and Australia) South America (Brazil, Argentina) Europe (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Russia and Italy) Middle East Africa (UAE, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and South Africa) Drivers In this Exploration, the CRM Analytics Market report gives a full illumination of the main thrusts of the CRM Analytics market. It features the vitally main thrusts of the market, The main considerations driving the development of the CRM Analytics market are the rising Important on merging advanced and actual universes Restraints Expanding Spot concentrate It covers different ventures that are creating in similar field, distinguishes the fundamental areas of utilization and figures out which of them will assume a significant part. The report additionally inspects a portion of the new innovations and improvements introduced by makers that are supposed to become remarkable motors for the worldwide CRM Analytics market. Make an Enquiry for purchasing this Report @ https //www.quincemarketinsights.com/enquiry-before-buying/enquiry-before-buying-63286?utm_source=offpage/pranali Years considered for this report Historical year – 2019-2020 Base year – 2021 Estimated Year -2022 Forecast period – 2023 to 2032 FAQ What is the market size and growth rate forecast for CRM Analytics? What are the Important driving factors propelling the CRM Analytics Market forward? What are the Key leading companies in the CRM Analytics Market Industry? What segments does the CRM Analytics covers? Who are the top manufacturers in the CRM Analytics market? What are the major market opportunities, challenges, and threats faced by the CRM Analytics market? About Us QMI has the most comprehensive collection of market research products and services available on the web. We deliver reports from virtually all major publications and refresh our list regularly to provide you with immediate online access to the world’s most extensive and up-to-date archive of professional insights into global markets, companies, goods, and patterns. Contact us Quince Market Insights Phone +1 208 405 2835 Email sales@quincemarketinsights.com Website https //www.quincemarketinsights.com/
https://w.atwiki.jp/mrfrtech/pages/103.html
Market Scenario Security Analytics Market is the portion arrangements with programming, algorithms, and cycles that dissect security dangers to IT frameworks. Security analytics surveys the security danger to a PC framework so the framework can be shielded from possible dangers. The security examination market has great possibilities for development in the gauge time frame. Also, the headway in malware and digital danger nature positively impacts the security analytics market. Security examination centers around the various parts of information analytics connected with online protection dangers. The information investigated is utilized to expand the safety efforts connected with an IT framework. One illustration of the use of safety examination is the most common way of observing organization traffic. Network analytics are utilized to survey security dangers and increment security. Security analytics is the science behind identifying dangers and their earnestness instead of safeguarding the framework. Just when the dangers are all around surveyed, would security be able to be raised to stay away from the dangers. Knowing dangers through security analytics gives a benefit to a designated goal, which is more powerful. Security analytics is involved today in various organizations. As each organization relies upon IT frameworks for sure, security analytics see the appeal. The security analytics market faces appeal today; every IT framework is in danger of digital dangers. Security examination offers the benefit of a comprehensive perspective on dangers as it thinks about both continuous and verifiable information. Thus, a network protection master gets a top-to-bottom perspective on the danger appraisal. Security analytics reinforce an association's security firewalls by giving proof supported bits of knowledge. Online protection specialists lean toward security examination for network safety on the grounds that the wiggle room lessens dramatically. The security examination market, in this manner, has a time of development ahead. Request a Free Sample @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/4211 Competitive Outlook Leading players in the global security analytics market include Alien Vault Inc., Blue Coat Systems Inc., Alert Logic Inc. (Click Security), LogRhythm Inc., Arbor Networks Inc., FireEye Inc., EMC RSA, HP Enterprise, IBM Corporation, and Cisco Systems Inc. Major tech giants such as Cisco, IBM, and HP are making significant investments in the security analytics sector due to the growing use of mobile devices for communication and data sharing. The growing demand for cloud computing and the Internet of Things is also likely to be a major driver for investment in the security analytics sector over the forecast period. Segmentation The Security Analytics market separates into various sections in light of various measures. The market portions are partitioned as per application and organization. The market for Security Analytics Segments additionally incorporates administrations and association size. One more portion of the market is based upon verticals. By Application There are various utilizations of safety analytics, for instance, Web Security Analytics, Network Security Analytics, and EndPoint Security Analytics. By Services There is a wide range of administrations that security examination offers to the areas. For instance, proficient administrations and counselling are a piece of administration. By Organization Size Today, the security analytics market takes care of both SMEs and huge scope undertakings. Regional Analysis The worldwide Security Analytics market scatters over various areas of the world. The major local security analytics markets are North America, Asia Pacific, and Europe right off the bat. Also, the minor territorial business sectors consolidate into the Rest of the World. Also, these provincial business sectors are made of individual nations of the locale. As per the Security Analytics Market analytics, the greatest provincial market for Security Analytics is the North American area. Additionally, the USA will hold the biggest portion of Security Analytics Market Sales. Then again, Asia Pacific will enlist the most elevated CAGR for the figure time frame. Industry News There are numerous new turns of events and security examination market drifts that help the security analytics market development. The new advancement of the market is as per the following. In November 2019, IBM Corporation sent off Cloud Pak, a security examination and danger insight stage. In November 2018, IBM Corporation delivered Qradar Advisor. The Qradar Advisor relies upon the Corporation's own Watson AI. Watson AI is prepared to complete danger examination and deliver fitting security reactions in reprisal. IBM Corporation discharged Security Connect in October 2018, which associates network safety applications to a cloud-based stage. Aside from this, the central participants of the market embrace various acquisitions and consolidations to help positive security examination of market patterns. Browse Full Report Details @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/security-analytics-market-4211 Table of Contents 1Executive Summary 2Scope of the Report 2.1Market Definition 2.2Scope of the Study 2.2.1Research objectives 2.2.2Assumptions Limitations 2.3Markets Structure Continued…. View Similar Report** Internet of Things (IoT) Market By Software (Data Management, Network Management), By Hardware(Sensors, camera), By Services (Manage Services, Professional Services), By Organization Type (Small and Medium Scale Business, Large Scale Business) https //ictmrfr.blogspot.com/2022/03/blockchain-as-service-market-share.html https //ictmrfr.blogspot.com/2022/03/digital-payment-in-healthcare-market.html Rugged Handheld Electronic Devices Market https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/rugged-handheld-devices-market-8047 Industry News The global Security Analytics market Share Report Market Trends has been affected due to the lockdown across the regions. This pandemic situation has hampered the Security Analytics market Share Report Market Growth as well as its productivity, supply chain, and others. Moreover, the global market has lost its investors due to the increasing loss for the products, supply, transportation, workforce, and others. However, in the meantime, the key market players have implied various strategic techniques to boost global market growth. Thus, to meet the global market demands, the global market increased its speed in producing more valuable products for its intended customers. Recently, the global market has stabilized its position in the global market and is expected to register a higher Security Analytics market Share Report Market Size for the forecast period. About Market Research Future At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research Consulting Services. Contact Market Research Future (Part of Wantstats Research and Media Private Limited) 99 Hudson Street, 5Th Floor New York, NY 10013 United States of America 1 628 258 0071 (US) 44 2035 002 764 (UK) Email sales@marketresearchfuture.com Website https //www.marketresearchfuture.com
https://w.atwiki.jp/drip122/pages/30.html
httpsとhttpの違いを調査 httpsはサーバとブラウザ間を暗号化して送受信してくれる暗号化プロトコル。
https://w.atwiki.jp/mrfrtech/pages/17.html
Market Highlights The adoption of the concept of online meetings by various organizations is spurring the online meeting software market 2020. The software reports are formed by Market Research Future, which covers market alternatives for progress. The Global Online Meeting Software Market is expected to register a CAGR of 11.1% during the forecast period of 2020–2027. There are various factors contributing to the growth of the global online meeting software such as the increasing digitalization and urbanization which is increasing the adoption of online meeting software among the enterprises to reduce the distance between the clients globally. The surge in the concept of work from home due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, the market share of online meeting software is estimated to rise steadily in the impending period. Their surging application in conducting webinars and for web conferencing is predicted to direct the online meeting software market in the forecast period. Segmental Analysis The global online meeting software market has been segmented based on component, deployment, organization size, end user, and region. By component, the market has been segmented into software and services. By deployment, the market has been segmented into cloud-based and on-premise By organization size, the market has been segmented into large enterprises and SMEs. By end user, the market has been segmented into BFSI, IT telecom, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and others By region, the market has been segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the rest of the world. Request a Free Sample @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/8297 Detailed Regional Analysis The global online meeting software market is estimated to grow at a significant rate in the future. The geographical analysis of online meeting software market has been conducted for North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the rest of the world. North America dominates the global online meeting software market, by region, due to the early adoption of the web conferencing services and online meeting. Additionally, there are various companies present in the region who offers various online meeting software and services which is driving the growth of the market. Additionally, high internet speed and developed infrastructure which increases the demand for the online meeting software market in the region. The US accounts the largest market share in the region due to presence of various industries and end-users in the region who are using these software and services such as BFSI, IT telecom, government agencies, and others. Whereas, Canada is expected to be the fastest-growing country in the region during the forecast period. Europe accounts the second-largest market share in the online meeting software market due to presence of various industries such as automotive, BFSI, IT telecom, and others which is driving the market. Additionally, the presence of various countries such as the UK, Germany, France, Italy, and others in the region are the major contributors in the global online meeting market. Additionally, the increasing ownership of smartphones has also accelerated the market growth in the region as the users can attend the web conference with smartphones irrespective of their location. Asia-Pacific is expected to be the fastest-growing region during the forecast period due to increasing advancement in terms of technology, urbanization, and digitalization. The present companies and upcoming startups are adopting online meeting software to increase their client conversion. Additionally, the SMEs and large enterprise are also using this software to reduce their spend on travel and increase the productivity and efficiency of the work without spending much on traveling. China is expected to be the dominating country in the region whereas India is accounted to be the fastest-growing country during the forecast period. Rest of the world is segmented as South America and Middle East Africa is expected to be growing with a significant CAGR during the forecast period due to development of infrastructure and investments made by various industries in the region. Additionally, the subsidiaries and startups are using smartphones for online meeting to conduct training and conferencing. Competitive Analysis The capability of contenders to influence change in the market is increasing at a stable rate in the impending period. The support from government bodies around the world is rising because the market needs an extra stimulus to achieve normalcy in such a scenario. The disharmony in the forces of demand and supply are estimated to create a slow growth background in the market. Furthermore, the need to adopt a rapid and cost-effective method of operation is estimated to profile the market in the impending period. The emphasis on innovation is estimated to rise in the coming years, as the consumer needs have to be addressed in a better manner to ensure the resurgence of the global market. Also, the need to encourage business to include the environmental impact of their decisions is estimated to shape the progress of the market in future. The need to mitigate losses sustained by the current public health crisis is estimated to be the sole focus of the market contenders in the upcoming years. The eminent contenders in the online meeting software market are Nextiva (US), RingCentral, Inc. (US), Amazon Web Services, Inc. (US), Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd. (India), Jive Communications (US), Vonage (US), Ooma, Inc. (US), FluentStream Technologies, LLC (US), Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (US), LogMeIn, Inc (US), Cisco Systems (US), Dialpad, Inc. (US), 8x8, Inc. (US), IBM Corporation (US), Microsoft Corporation (US) among others. Browse Full Report Details @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/online-meeting-software-market-8297 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Scope of The Report 2.1 Market Definition 2.2 Scope of The Study 2.2.1 Research Objectives 2.2.2 Assumptions Limitations 2.3 Market Structure Continued… Similar Report Application Management Services Market By Service-Type (System Integration, Consulting Services, Modernization Services, And Others), By Organization Size, By Deployment, And By End-Users Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Market By Security Type (Human Intelligence, Content Intelligence, Dark Web Analysis, Link/Network Analysis, Data Analytics, Text Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Others), Technology (Bid Data Software, Video Analytics, Text Analytics, Visualization Tool, Cyber Security, Web Analysis, Social Media Analysis, Others), Application (Military Defense, Homeland Security, Private Sector, Public Sector, National Security, Others) About Market Research Future At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research Consulting Services. Contact Market Research Future (Part of Wantstats Research and Media Private Limited) 99 Hudson Street, 5Th Floor New York, NY 10013 United States of America 1 628 258 0071 (US) 44 2035 002 764 (UK) Email sales@marketresearchfuture.com Website https //www.marketresearchfuture.com #market #research #industry #data #growth #trend #report #analyis #share #marketing #forecast #digital #geographic #demographic #gnews Plugin Error キーワードを入力してください。 #tech #researchreport #marketreport #futrue
https://w.atwiki.jp/testlink/pages/40.html
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN""DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd" !-- Japanese Translated by Testing Engineer s Forum (TEF) in Japan, Working Group of TestLink Japanese Translation Project -- html xmlns="http //www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="jp" head meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" / meta http-equiv="Content-language" content="jp" / meta name="author" content="Martin Havlat" / meta name="copyright" content="GNU" / meta name="robots" content="NOFOLLOW" / title TestLink Instructions /title style media="all" type="text/css" @import "../../{$smarty.const.TL_THEME_CSS_DIR}testlink.css"; /style script type="text/javascript" src="../../javascript/testlink_library.js" /script /head body div class="workBack" h1 テストケース実行 /h1 h2 目的 /h2 p テストケース実行をユーザに許可します。ユーザはテスト結果をビルドに対してのテストケースに割り当てることができます。フィルタ、設定(セッティング)についてのいろいろな情報については span class="help" onclick="javascript open_popup( ./execFilter.html );" ヘルプ /span を参照してください。 /p h2 やってみましょう！ /h2 ol li テスト計画を実行するビルドを決定しなければなりません。 /li li プルダウンからビルドと、ナビゲーションシートの「更新」ボタンを選択してください。 /li li すべてのテストケース、テストスイートを参照するために「テストスイート」をクリックしてください。 /li li テストケースの結果と適切な備考、バグについての情報が表示されます。 /li /ol /div /body /html
https://w.atwiki.jp/keisks/pages/223.html
学生向けtips等々 How to Be a Successful PhD Student (in Computer Science (in NLP/ML)) http //www.cs.jhu.edu/~mdredze/publications/HowtoBeaSuccessfulPhDStudent.pdf My Advice To My Graduate Students http //muratbuffalo.blogspot.com/2013/04/my-advice-to-my-students.html Ph.D. 2.0 Rethinking the Ph.D. Application http //jeffhuang.com/rethinking_the_phd_application.html# 大学院・研究者を目指す人へ http //www7b.biglobe.ne.jp/~masaoamano/Masao_Amanos/for_future_graduate_students.html Don’t prematurely obsess on a single “big problem” or “big theory” http //terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/dont-prematurely-obsess-on-a-single-big-problem-or-big-theory/ 博士のための「けものみち」就職活動ガイド http //blog.lilyx.net/2009/03/30/job-hunt-for-doctoral-students/ 武蔵野日記 http //d.hatena.ne.jp/mamoruk/ 研究向けtips How to Do Great Research http //greatresearch.org How to Read a Technical Paper http //cs.jhu.edu/~jason/advice/how-to-read-a-paper.html http //old-site.clsp.jhu.edu/wiki2/NLP_Reading_Group#Variational_inference SIGIR Paper Writing Tips http //research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/pbailey/sigir-paper-writing-tips.aspx?1702280376 Top publications - Computational Linguistics http //scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues hl=en vq=eng_computationallinguistics Leo s Chronicle http //leoclock.blogspot.com/search/label/Academia 松尾ぐみ http //ymatsuo.com/japanese/matsuogumi.html プレゼン向けtips 伝わるデザイン http //tsutawarudesign.web.fc2.com/ 15 Seconds to a Better Presentation http //www.inc.com/geoffrey-james/15-seconds-to-a-better-presentation.html my tips 技術的、数学的に分からない箇所はStackExchangeですぐに解決。 http //stackexchange.com/sites
https://w.atwiki.jp/testlink/pages/37.html
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN""DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd" !-- Japanese Translated by Testing Engineer s Forum (TEF) in Japan, Working Group of TestLink Japanese Translation Project -- html xmlns="http //www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="jp" head meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" / meta http-equiv="Content-language" content="jp" / meta name="author" content="Martin Havlat" / meta name="copyright" content="GNU" / meta name="robots" content="NOFOLLOW" / title TestLink Instructions /title style media="all" type="text/css" @import "{$basehref}{$smarty.const.TL_THEME_CSS_DIR}testlink.css"; /style script // need due to global coupling in open_help_window()var fRoot= {$basehref} ; /script script type="text/javascript" src="{$basehref}gui/javascript/testlink_library.js" /script /head body div class="workBack" h1 テストケースの編集とアーカイブ /h1 h2 目的 /h2 p span class="help" onclick="javascript open_help_window( glosary , {$locale} );" テスト仕様書 /span は、存在する span class="help" onclick="javascript open_help_window( glosary , {$locale} );" テストプロジェクト /span , テストスイート,そして span class="help" onclick="javascript open_help_window( glosary , {$locale} );" テストケース /span の情報を閲覧したり変更したりする場所です。異なるバージョンのテストケースを見ることもできます。 /p h2 やってみましょう！ /h2 ol li テストプロジェクトをナビゲーションシートから選択します。 /li li 新規のテストスイートとテストケースを作成します(テストプロジェクトの変更は右上のプルダウンリストから選択できます) /li li 左横にあるツリーにてデータ編集を指示します。 /li li 作成したテスト仕様書をテストケースが準備完了したときに span class="help" onclick="javascript open_help_window( glosary , {$locale} );" テスト計画 /span に割り当てます。 /li /ol p TestLinkはテストケースを構成するN レベルのテストスイートを提供します。また、テストスイートの内容を記述できます。この情報はテストケースとともに印刷されます。 /p /div /body /html